|
The Intersessional Meeting on the Establishment of
a Control and Inspection Scheme was held in Yaizu, Japan
27-29 March 2001. Representatives of 16 Members of the
Commission, one State eligible to attend sessions of
the Commission and from one intergovernmental organization
attended the Session.
The Meeting first examined relevant international instruments,
existing Control and Inspection schemes and the outcome
of the adoption by COFI of the IPOA on IUU fishing.
Three Members then presented proposals for elements
such a scheme might address.
The Meeting reached consensus on the general principles
a Control and Inspection scheme should contain, but
deferred to a later time consideration as to whether
such a scheme should be binding on Contracting and Cooperating
Parties, pending clarification of legal issues. There
was consensus that the principle of flag State responsibilities
is an essential element of the Control and Inspection
Scheme, as well as on some of the actions that this
might encompass. There was full support for the idea
of a phased approach to implementation, starting from
minimum requirements applicable to all vessels, with
a pragmatic and adaptive application of different control
tools.
In discussing compliance and enforcement, at-sea inspection
did not garner wide support, but it was recognized that
at-port inspections were necessary, while taking due
care to avoid discrimination or practices that could
lead to loss of quality of the catch. There was consensus
on the principle that observer programmes constitute
a valuable tool for monitoring fisheries even in the
absence of any enforcement role and it was agreed that
Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) are a valuable element
to be incorporated in later phases of the Scheme.
There was agreement that a clear procedure to follow
in the case of a potential violation needs to be developed,
in accordance to international agreements, but more
work is needed to define what constitutes a violation
and the degrees of severity of potential violations.
There was a consensus that special consideration needs
to be given to developing nations and that active cooperation
should be established to facilitate the implementation
of the Control and Inspection Scheme. There was also
agreement concerning the establishment of a Control
and Inspection Committee, although the specific terms
of reference will be formulated in the future.
In relation to Other Matters, Japan introduced a revised
version of the draft Resolution Concerning an Action
Plan to Ensure the Effectiveness of the Conservation
Program for Bigeye Tuna in the IOTC Area of Competence,
that had been presented at the Fifth Session of the
IOTC. This version was revised after further consultation
with other contracting parties. The Meeting agreed that
the action plan has merit but should be deferred for
further consideration.
|